Phase Two Consultation

In Phase Two, Navitus Bay presented plans in eight locations across the region. Over 2,000 people attended the Phase Two events which were held in February and March 2012. Navitus Bay received 801 partially completed or fully completed feedback forms during the consultation period.

Consultees were asked people to view different wind park development options to gauge which turbine size layout would have the biggest visual impact. Of the 272 responses:

  • 118 stated that the 3.6MW turbines would have the greatest visual impact.
  • 84 stated that the larger 9MW turbines would have the greatest impact.
  • 49 stated that a range (ie 3.6 and 9MW turbines) would have the greatest impact
  • 21 respondents stated that they had not seen the visuals.

The proposed development was divided into four sections and consultees were asked to indicate relevant concerns with constructing wind turbines in each of the four areas. 418 people
responded to this question and 51 did not provide an answer. The results are shown below.

arrowClick here for the summary of the responses.

ANSWERS RECEIVED
AREA F
AREA G
AREA H
AREA 1
Visual impact
Decrease in tourism
The navigation of commercial
vessels, eg. ferry in the area
The navigation of recreational
boats, eg. yachts in the area.
Reduction in diving activity
Reduction in fishing activity
Impact on birds
Impact on marine mammals and fish
Impact on other wild sea/life
Impact on the coastline
Impact on the seabed
Impact on wrecks, unexpoded
munitions and offshore
archaelogy
373
239
240
312
157
209
289
249
229
269
242
157

303
199
236
271
134
201
276
233
215
234
223
145

282
184
221
266
124
193
270
232
214
221
222
142

189
134
226
226
106
183
258
223
203
190
215
152

In response to the principal concerns relating to (1) a higher number of small turbines; and (2) development in the northern section of the proposed development area, we made a number of changes to the offshore development area. We also took into consideration feedback we received from key regulators and other local consultees. A summary of the offshore project revisions is shown in figure 8 and figure 9 shows the original and revised offshore development area.

arrowClick here to view figure 8.

FIGURE 8 - SUMMARY OF THE OFFSHORE PROJECT REVISIONS
WHAT HAS CHANGED
ORIGINAL OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT AREA
REVISED OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT AREA
IMPACT
Development boundary of the wind park from the north-west shore







Turbine range being considered





Maximum installed capacity




Number of turbines

Height of the turbines considered (from base to tip)
Area of seabed taken up by the offshore development area

16.5km (or 10.2 miles) from Bournemouth
13.5km (or 8.4 miles) from Hengistbury Head (Christchurch)
Turbines with an installed capacity of between 3.6mW and 9mW
1,200mW




a maximum of 333
a maximum of 210m
198 square kilometres (or 76 square miles)
19.7km (or 12.2 miles) from Bournemouth
16.4km (or 10.2 miles) from Hengistbury Head (Christchurch)
Turbines with an installed capacity of between 5mW and 8mW

Approximately 1,100mW



A maximum of 218
A maximum of 200m
175 square kilometres (or 67 square miles)
Reduce the potential visual impact
Protect navigational safety for vessels entering the solent
Reduce the potential visual impact
Lower the number of turbines needed
Reduce amount of renewable energy that could be generated
Reduce the potential visual impact
Reduce the potential visual impact
Less seabed disturbance

arrowClick here to view figure 9.

Navitus Bay Phase 2 Survey map

The original and revised offshore development area